Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Foot washing revisited


As a child growing up in post-World War II New York City, specifically in the East Bronx, I learned a whole lot about the individual rituals of Judaism.  My neighborhood was on the cusp between an ethnic Irish and ethnic Ashkenazi   Jewish neighborhood.  The families who lived in the five floor walkup pre-war apartment building I lived in were Irish –American or Jewish American – and that was it.

From an early age I understood that the Sabbath was on Friday night and Saturdays for some folks in the building and on Sunday morning for the rest of us. I knew that Shabbos meant that families had a meal together and good stuff like challah and brisket were often part of the meal.  My father was a Shabbos Goy for two widowed Jewish women on our floor.  Esther Shapario’s family had immigrated from Russia in the 1920’s and Anna Bruns was a recent immigrant from Belgium after the war. Mrs.  Bruns had a numbered tattoo on her arm that indicted she had been in a concentration camp during the war.   Children were told not to ask her about it, but grown-ups spoke about it I hushed tones. My father’s reward for turning lights on and off and checking on the tea kettle was several quarts of extremely good chicken soup that we would happily devour.

I also knew that then men wore long black coats, big beaver hats, and had prayer shawl tassels that hung from under their shirts.  I also understood that they needed at least ten men who had been bar-mitzvahed in order to have prayer time.  This meant that sometimes the younger boys were sent out of the local synagogue to rustle up a few good men.

There were rituals for so many things including ritual washing of both hands and feet.

In the Gospel lesson for Maundy Thursday, we hear the yearly story about Jesus’ washing the feet of the apostles.  In ancient Israel most folks either wore sandals or went shoeless.  This meant that when someone entered your home, they were tracking in lots of dust, dirt and dung from the local village or farm.  It was customary for the host to offer his guests the ability to wash their hands and to have their feet washed.  The host would not be washing the feet of the guest, his servant would do it.  If there were no servants, the wife or daughter would be assigned this task. Men of honor or status would not stoop so low as to wash another’s feet.  In this telling, Jesus turns the tables on his followers, whom, by the way, were playing the “Who is the most important” game, wondering which of them was the top banana…after Jesus of course. 

Jesus silently takes a bowl, pitcher and wraps a towel around himself and begins this menial task to the shock of his followers.  He then instructs them to follow his example and do likewise…to become servants to all.  We will replicated this act of Christ in this community, a replication, I dare say, that is a comfortable re-creation of this act of humanity on the part of Christ. We know each other reasonably well, are comfortable with each other and since we all knew ahead of time that we’d be called upon to do this, I think I can safely say…most have made sure their chosen foot for this ablution, is relatively clean.

So, I want you to think about this scenario: washing the feet of people you do not know.  Just as we have done our own version of “Ashes to Go”, there are several congregations around the nation who have embraced foot washing as a ministry on the streets.

Earlier this month, a group of people from a Methodist Church in Richmond, Virginia, gathered together a collection of latex gloves, nail clippers, and antibacterial soap and opened the church doors to a cadre of street people who were, at first, a bit skeptical about allowing complete strangers to wash, rinse and towel dry their feet and then give them each  a new clean pair of socks to wear.

Last year Samuel Wells, a chaplain at Duke University integrated foot washing into the liturgy and washed the feet of students, the housekeeping staff and colleagues.

Black and white Christians have washed one another's feet as a sign of racial reconciliation at religious conferences in various American cities including Memphis and Birmingham. Last year the spokesman for the Presbyterian Church in Canada spoke about the practice of incorporating foot-washing in marriage ceremonies.

As part of their Maundy Thursday practice, British monarchs have washed the feet of selected peasants as part of a ritual that dates back to the 13th century.  Curiously, by the 17th century the royal leader either had the feet of the peasant pre-washed or just had an underling do it.  This practice is no longer in vogue.  Queen Elizabeth II does not have anyone removing their shoes and socks in her presence, at least not on Maundy Thursday.

But is this sudden interest in reviving a religious ritual in so intimate and familiar a style does raise some interesting questions for modern Christians. Can this ritual be used as a symbol of reconciliation?  Two years ago a group of Hutus and    Tutsis, enemies during the war in Rwanda washed each other’s feet in as a symbol of reconciliation. Can it be a symbol of humility? In 1998 a senator from Kansas washed the feet of one retiring from his office.  He claims this was a symbol of “servant leadership.”

But what do recipients of foot washing feel about this practice?  In a recent article in the Washington Post, a woman who routinely gets her feet washed by the group in Richmond has said, “At first it was weird. Because you have corns and bunions, you know, and you don’t want anybody handling your feet.  When they put your feet into that hot water, whew! It sure feels like heaven.”

And just maybe, that is what it is meant to remind us of…heaven… a fore taste of what is to come in a little space and time.

Monday, March 30, 2015

Musings on Maundy Thursdays past.


Maundy Thursday

 

Over the years I have preached more often then not on Maundy Thursday. In that process I have learned many interesting factoids about how it is observed in various places and unique rites, rituals and menus that have sprung around its commemoration.

In the Scandinavian countries, Maundy Thursday is a national holiday, as it is in the Philippines, Spain, Columbia, Venezuela and Uruguay.

In Germany, it is known as Grundonnerstag or Green Thursday and the main meal consists of green vegetable soup and salads. In Bulgaria it is the day children color their Easter eggs and adults clean the houses. In other Slovak regions a pastry called Judases (yu da ses) which are reminiscently shaped like nooses ( a bit creepy, I must say) and served with coffee and honey are consumed for breakfast or for dessert on Maundy Thursday. In most parts of Europe the tradition of the “silent bells” is followed where it is said, the bells fly to Rome for confession, and children roam the streets with wooden clappers or rattles collecting treats and coins from friends and neighbors.

In Southern Europe, Italy and Malta for example, there is a tradition of visiting seven neighboring churches after the Maundy Thursday Eucharist at your home church in a mini-pilgrimage stopping at the altar of repose at the various sites to sit and pray for a while. I have to say I do remember this ritual growing up in post World War II NYC especially in the Irish-Italian neighborhood of my Brooklyn childhood. The number “seven” is said to represent the “Last Seven Words of Christ” from the passion Gospels which were not “words” at all but phrases that include the familiar “Father forgive them”, “ Son, Behold thy Mother”, and "It is finished”.

But my favorite new fact is from England.  My first interesting factoid from Great Britain was the “Maundy Money” ritual by which the British monarch currently honors local citizens who work to improve life in their communities.  It derives from the custom of medieval monarch washing the feet of paupers and distributing alms. 

I learned that in some parts of the British Isles this day was called Sheer Thursday, as in cutting sheers because it is when men trimmed beards and hair and all the folks, men and women, boys and girls, took an actual bath to clean up for the upcoming Easter following the model of the washing of the feet and Peter’s declaration that Jesus could wash is head and hands also.

But I always go back to the meaning of “maundy” itself which is connected to the Latin word “mandatum” which refers to the command from Jesus that his followers “love one another as I have loved you.”

Yet I also think it should refer to another one of his statements in the Gospel:

For I have set you an example that you also should do as I have done to you.”

This command is more difficult than one might think. It is one thing to wash the feet of those we know.  One comment that I heard as we recruited Washees for foot washing was “Remember, you have to come in to church with feet already washed.” On Facebook a deacon I know from Alabama sent around a posting of preparing for Maundy Thursday with a photo of a woman getting a pedicure before having her feet re-washed in church. The deacon who posted this and I both found this somewhat amusing, but also shocking.

It made me think of the phrase: “How does what we do here affect or involve those living in poverty?”

Who in our present society washes the feet of others?  Usually young struggling immigrant women, either Asian or Hispanic who toil for low wages and tips at the local nail salon. Aides and orderlies in local hospitals, rehab centers and nursing homes work with the ill for low wages.  Home health care givers who work with our elderly family members who also are mostly immigrant women from third world nations struggling to live a decent life and send money home to loved ones.

So, how should we approach this ritual of foot washing? Reverently and humbly…remembering that we are following the example that Jesus sets before us and that as participants, we are carrying on an ancient tradition from his first disciples. They had big shoes to fill, those first followers of Jesus, and we can look to their example to try to do the same.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Reading Scripture

My congregation on Staten Island has committed itself to reading the whole Bible in a year.  Many of us purchased the "NRSV Daily Bible" and began our reading on New Year's Day 2015.  In two days we will have read from Genesis through 1 Samuel. We sit and discuss it either on Wednesday evening through Lent or on Sunday morning during Coffee Hour.  You can imagine the dedication of this group of readers who give up most of coffee hour and the socialization that it brings, to sit around a table and listen to others discuss and dispute the meaning of these ancient texts. 


Genesis and its two versions of creation was mulled over for its poetic repetitions in the creation story: "And there was evening and there was morning..." and the wonderful metaphoric descriptions of creation followed by the ordering of the animals, noting the sudden switch of voice and point of view, "...then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being". Powerfully written stuff, we all agreed, but how factual? Hum...




We milled over the biblical stories of brothers: Issac and the half sibling Ismael,  Jacob and Esau, Joseph and his many brothers, Moses and Aaron, Aarons sons: Nadab and Abihu who foolishly offered "unholy fire" and were destroyed and the remaining sons, probably traumatized for life:
Image result for David and his lyre
David and his lyre
Eleazar and Ithamer, the corrupt sons of the prophets Eli and Samuel, and David and his older brothers...talk about sibling rivalry! They are all here; the good the bad and the very ugly, fraternal disputes and possible fratricide, good deeds and deceptions, appetites and ambitions. And we noted over and over again the theme of "...and the last shall be as the first."








Image result for Leah and Rachel
Leah and Rachael
And those women, at least the ones we meet up close and personal, they are certainly both memorable and formative!  Sarah must have been quite a beauty if her husband tried to pass her off as his sister to avoid being killed by rulers and reckless men desperate for a night of her charms.  And of course, the lesser sister, Leah, whose beautiful eyes are mentioned as her best asset; she is certainly the more fertile of the sisters, although we know her husband, Jacob, preferred her younger sister Rachael. One has to admire the tenacity of Moses mother, Jochebed  and his brave sister, Miriam, although her treatment in the book of Numbers seems rather harsh. She and Aaron have decided that their little bro was getting a bit too big for his britches, and wondered aloud why he got to go and commune with the Almighty. So what happens?  She gets stricken with leprosy for seven days, and Aaron is left crying  and making atonement for this sin in his priestly role! Of course we get to read about Deborah, one of the wisest judges of Israel and the lovely heartfelt story of Ruth and Naomi.


We have read about some memorable men: Abraham, of course, the father of nations, but also Esau, the cheated brother and Ismail, the deserted son, and Boaz the loving second husband of Ruth and savior of her mother-in-law Naomi, and finally Jonathan, Saul's son and confidant of David, doomed to neither rule or thrive. Saul and David and Isaac and Jacob may get the big press, but the lesser guys of Scripture have quite a lot to offer us in learning about human nature, ambition and loss.


I will say that I have found the  readings to be both phantasmagorical and extremely bloody, but some are surprising to me.  I had always thought David killed Goliath with his blow to the forehead.  I was wrong.  In reality, the slingshot stone knocked him out and the stabbing into his back and the beheading really done Goliath in.  It makes sense to read the whole account and not just the abbreviated Sunday morning version.


So we will continue on our reading journey, and I suppose, I will be musing more on this as the year goes on.  If you want to join us, we are about to begin 2 Samuel in a few days.

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Ole Blue Eyes

I recently heard on NPR ( National Public Radio) that we are fast approaching the centenary of the birth of Frank Sinatra. Francis Albert Sinatra was born in Hoboken, New Jersey on the 12th of December 1915. His impact on American popular music and the canon that is referred to as the Great American Songbook is immeasurable.



Frankie actually had a connection to my family.  My mother's first cousin was a classmate of Frankie in elementary school.  It seems the teachers loved to have young Francis sing the opening songs at every school assembly.  His peers, at that time, were not so supportive, and Mom related that her cousin and her pals would roll their eyes and snicker that he was the "teacher's pet".  Now since all involved are no longer with us, it is difficult to prove the provenance of this family folk tale.


but Sinatra is kind of aThere is no dispute that Sinatra was the singer of his generation.  My parents preferred the music of Glen Miller, but Frank was a constant presence on New York radio through out the 50s and 60's.  Frank's voice failed him in 1950; he hemorrhaged his vocal cords while singing at the Copacabana and did not sing for over a year. His comeback was bolstered by his appearance in the Burt Lancaster-Deborah Kerr film, "From Here to Eternity" for which he won an Academy Award as Best Supporting Actor.  Trivia note here: When Turner Classics decided to colorizer this classic black and white film, their colorist gave Frank brown eyes, a faux pas that was quickly corrected.


Everyone has their favorite Sinatra song or two. I do like his ode to lost love and lost time, "The Summer Wind" and am hoping to have it played as I am laid to rest. I have heard it was also one of Frank's favorites. It always takes me back to my summers in Connecticut with my family and summertime friends. It brings back memorable days past and love unrequited.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIltgDzgvk8


Others may prefer one of his saloon songs.  He did those quite well. This is probably one of his most memorable: "One for My Baby"....of course, nowadays...he would not be driving after having one more for the road; hopefully the bartender would be calling him a cab.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m121tmJzcAc


Another Sinatra classic has to be "All the Way"...it sort of sums up his work in the decade between 1950 and 1960. He had fabulous breath control. He developed this as a young man by conscientiously swimming laps to learn how to control his breathing and making a breath last longer to hold the notes steady and clear. He was a true craftsman at his art.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4LiAfyQ0TE&feature=youtube_gdata


Image result for twisting 60'sIn the sixties Sinatra succumbed to some questionable musical decisions, but, hey...it was the 60's. But I wonder who convinced him to actually record this one, and it's on his own label!  I don't get it now, and I didn't understand it then. Everybody may have been twisting, but Frank, you did not have to sing about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDCjBC6DvqE&feature=youtube_gdata


Perhaps his finest hour in in later career was his ode to living ones life in a manner true to one's self.
I remember a priest that I know told us that he was taken aback when one of the blue-haired ladies, a stalwart of his urban church community, had this anthem of fully living life played as she was taken from the church to her final resting place.  Got to admire her chutzpah.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egY8rUpxqcE


But the one Sinatra tune that always brings a tear to my eye is a tune penned by Eubie Blake in the 1930's.  When I hear it I can close my own baby blues and with my mind's eye, see those who have gone before dancing to this classic...and the metaphor of "...a rosary of tears" is such a touching phrase.  Enjoy Franks striking version of "Memories of You", and another sweet interpretation from Bette Midler:
Frankie first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkKeUiaji3o&feature=youtube_gdata
Then Bette's: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ726TMtRHY